Structured notes with the uncertain fields marked, referrals triaged against your own criteria, and literature work that shows what has actually been replicated.
Structured notes with the uncertain fields marked, referrals triaged against your own criteria, and literature work that shows what has actually been replicated.
Deployed in your own tenancy with de-identification before any egress. Retention windows are set by you and can be zero. Nothing is used to train a model.
Problem
Notes are written after hours because the day is full of patients.
After
The note is structured from the encounter and waiting for review before the next patient is seen.
Problem
An automated note that quietly fills a gap is worse than no note at all.
After
Low-confidence fields are marked and left for the clinician. Nothing is silently invented.
Problem
A literature review takes a week and still misses the failed replications.
After
Findings are separated into replicated, single-source and contradicted, with the papers attached.
The agent marks what it was unsure of. A confident-looking note that is wrong is the failure mode this design exists to prevent.
Protected health information does not leave the boundary you configure, in any deployment mode.
Replication status stated per finding, so a single striking paper is not mistaken for a settled result.
Deployed in your own tenancy with de-identification before any egress. Retention windows are set by you and can be zero. Nothing is used to train a model.
What sold it internally was that it says when it is not sure. Our clinicians trusted it because it admits the gaps rather than papering over them.