Skip to content
Deployment brief

Decisions fast enough to sit inline, documented well enough to defend

Scoring inside the authorisation window, filings drafted with their evidence, and an audit trail for every decision the system made.

18ms Decision latency, p99 inside the authorisation window
-62% False positives against prior rules same detection rate
-84% Filing preparation time draft, not submission
100% Decisions with a full audit trail retained per your policy

Scoring inside the authorisation window, filings drafted with their evidence, and an audit trail for every decision the system made.

Deployed inside your network with no egress required. Model weights can run on your own hardware where the regulator requires it.

Before and after

Problem

The rules engine flags too much, so analysts triage noise instead of risk.

After

Graph context separates the ninth structured transfer from the one large ordinary payment.

Problem

A filing takes a day to assemble because the evidence is in six systems.

After

The draft arrives with the transactions, the timeline and the reasoning already attached.

Problem

The regulator asks why a decision was made and nobody can reconstruct it.

After

Every decision keeps its inputs, its model version and its score.

What ships

Inline scoring

A hard latency budget the agent is held to, so risk can sit in the payment path rather than behind it.

Draft filings, never submissions

The system prepares; a compliance officer reviews and signs. That boundary is not configurable.

Reproducible decisions

Model version, feature values and score retained together, so a decision can be re-examined months later.

How it is wired

Deployed inside your network with no egress required. Model weights can run on your own hardware where the regulator requires it.

The alert volume dropped by two thirds and we caught more, not less. The analysts noticed within a fortnight.
Tomasz Werner Head of Financial Crime · Meridian Clearing
False positives down 62%
All solutions